Howard Gunty Profit Sharing Plan v. CareMatrix Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to appoint four co-lead plaintiffs represented by two law firms where “nothing suggest[ed] that they are a cohesive enough unit to adequately represent other plaintiffs”
• granting joint motion to appoint co-lead plaintiffs after “the plaintiffs groups had resolved their differences, chosen four individuals as lead plaintiffs, and proposed two law firms as co-lead counsel”
• \It is not necessary that proposed lead plaintiffs have a pre-litigation relationship[.]\
• “It is not necessary that proposed lead plaintiffs have a pre-litigation relationship[.]”
• “It is not necessary that proposed lead plaintiffs have a pre-litigation relationship[.]”
• “It is not necessary that proposed lead plaintiffs have a pre-litigation relationship[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).