Howard Guenther v. The Armstrong Rubber Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ordering a directed verdict for the defendant tire manufacturer although the plaintiff, who was injured by an allegedly defective tire sold by a department store, introduced evidence that the defendant manufactured 75-80% of tires sold by that store
• \[A]s we see it there was no justification for allowing plaintiff's case on that so-called probability hypothesis to go to a jury.\
• ―In other words, the law recognizes the fact that parties, as well as other witnesses, may honestly mistake the truth, and requires juries to find the facts by weighing all the testimony, whatever may be its source.‖ (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).