Howard E. Cox v. Mid-America Dairymen, Inc. Mid-America Dairymen, Inc. Retirement Plan the Northern Trust Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on City of Madison Joint Sch. Dist. v. Wis. 14 Employment Relations Comm'n, 429 U.S. 167, 175 n. 8 (1976
• “The problem with [plaintiff’s] cherry picking argument, however 14 is that it cuts both ways. She too cherry picks data.”
• although the claimant had a heart attack 21 and underwent angioplasty, he returned to work and only stopped working because of a plant closure
• court will affirm a \reasonable interpretation\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).