Skip to main content
· 7/1/1876

Howard Cooper & Co. v. Harris

Citations

  • 46 Tex. 189

Syllabus

<p>Practice—Officer—Beplevy.—ISTo recovery can he had, on motion, against an officer who levies an attachment, for failure to take a sufficient replevy bond.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • purported indemnity contract was ambiguous on its face and therefore not valid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.