Howard A. Fromson, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Advance Offset Plate, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there was no basis for incorporating theory of operation as limitation in claim
• stating that district courts are not bound by PTO reexamination decisions although they “must consider” such decisions as evidence “in determining whether the party asserting in- validity has met its statutory burden by clear and convinc- ing evidence”
• stating that district courts are not bound by PTO reexamination decisions although they “must consider” such decisions as evidence “in determining whether the party asserting in- validity has met its statutory burden by clear and convinc- ing evidence”
• “The Examiner’s decision, on an original or reissue application, is never binding on a court.”
• “This court reviews judgments, not opinions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).