Hovis v. General Dynamics Corp. (In Re Hovis)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying South Carolina law to both the Confidentiality Agreement and the APA and concluding that “MESC could not reasonably rely on any representations outside of the representations in the APA”
• applying New York law to the Confidentiality Agreement and concluding that “the Bankruptcy Court did not err in determining MESC did not have the right to rely on the alleged misrepresentations”
• “[T]he court agrees with the Bankruptcy Court that Delaware courts would give effect to the provisions [of the APA] and find that MESC could not justifiably rely on MESC’s alleged misrepresentations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).