Hovermale v. Berkeley Springs Moose Lodge No. 1483

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding business had duty under Restatement (Second) of Torts § 314A (1965) to help man who collapsed
• holding business had duty under Restatement (Second) of Torts § 314A (1965) to help man who collapsed
• holding business had duty under § 314A of the Restatement to help a man who fainted and that whether business met that duty was a question of fact for the jury
• stating that “[p]roof by a preponderance of the evidence requires only that a party satisfy the court or jury by sufficient evidence that the existence of a fact is more probable or likely than its nonexistence.”
• stating that \[p]roof by a preponderance of the evidence requires only that a party satisfy the court or jury by sufficient evidence that the existence of a fact is more probable or likely than its nonexistence.\
• finding that a business had a special relationship under Section 314A to render assistance to an invitee after it knew or had reason to know that the invitee was ill or injured

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).