Skip to main content
· 7/31/1992

Houswerth v. Neimiec

Citations

  • 603 So. 2d 88
  • 1992 WL 178952

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the dismissal of a replevin action for failure to prosecute was not a ruling on the merits and did not bar an action on the same claim
  • finding that “a dismissal for lack of prosecution is not a ruling on the merits and therefore cannot be the basis of a subsequent res judicata argument”
  • dismissal of replevin action for failure to prosecute was not a ruling on the merits and could not be the basis for applying res judicata to a subsequent action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.