· 7/31/1992
Houswerth v. Neimiec
Citations
- 603 So. 2d 88
- 1992 WL 178952
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the dismissal of a replevin action for failure to prosecute was not a ruling on the merits and did not bar an action on the same claim
- finding that “a dismissal for lack of prosecution is not a ruling on the merits and therefore cannot be the basis of a subsequent res judicata argument”
- dismissal of replevin action for failure to prosecute was not a ruling on the merits and could not be the basis for applying res judicata to a subsequent action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.