Houston v. . Thornton
Citations
- 29 S.E. 827
- 122 N.C. 365
- 1898 N.C. LEXIS 264
Syllabus
<p>Action Against Bank Directors — Issues—Bank Directors — Negligence—Liability of Bank Directors for False Statements of Bank's Condition — Purchasers of Stock — Summons—Statute of Limitations.</p> <p>1. In the trial of an action against the directors of a Bank for loss suffered by the plaintiff through the negligence of the defendants in permitting false statements of the Bank’s condition to be published by which the plaintiff was deluded as to the value of the stock and misled into purchasing it, it was proper to submit issues as to the negligence and wrongful acts of the defendants instead of issues as to whether there had been fraud and misrepresentations on the part of the defendants.</p> <p>2. The negligence of the directors of a national bank in permitting to be published false and fraudulent statements of the condition of the bank, whereby a person is misled into buying stock in the bank, is a wrong done to such purchaser for which the directors are liable directly to such purchaser and is a eausC of action which does not pass to the Receiver of the bank upon its insolvency.</p> <p>3. Directors of a national bank who, by their negligence, permit false and fraudulent statements of the bank’s condition to be published and . wrongful dividends to be declared, are liable to a person injured thereby whether or not they directly participated in the fraud by signing the statements or otherwise.</p> <p>4. In the trial of an action against the directors of a bank based upon their negligence in permitting false and fraudulent statements of the bank’s condition to be published and dividends to be declared, when the earnings did not justify them, the plaintiff’s right to recover should not be restricted to one instance of negligence when there are many others in evidence.</p> <p>5. The fact that bank directors, who left the management of the'bank to dishonest and careless officers by whom the bank was wrecked, resided away from the town where the bank was located and b
Judges: Clark, Douglas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Gilbert v. BagleyM.D. North Carolina· 1980-06-02· cited 60×
- Cotten v. Republic National Bank of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1965-10-15· cited 45×
- Brown v. Underwriters at Lloyd'sWashington Supreme Court· 1958-11-21· cited 31×
- Coble v. Beall.Supreme Court of North Carolina· 1902-06-13· cited 27×
- Schlechter v. FeltonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1916-07-21· cited 21×
- McAfee v. Rockford Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-07-27· cited 18×
- McClure v. FellowsSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1902-12-16· cited 11×
- New York Title & Mortgage Co. v. HuttonDistrict of Columbia· 1934-06-04· cited 10×
- Wheeler v. American National Bank of BeaumontCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1960-07-14· cited 8×
- Serino v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.D. South Carolina· 1967-05-03· cited 5×
- Coughlin v. State BankOregon Supreme Court· 1926-01-26· cited 5×
- Krueger v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1963-05-10· cited 5×
- Gear v. HenryHawaii Supreme Court· 1912-04-30· cited 3×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Seale v. BakerTexas Supreme Court· 1888-03-02· cited 54×
- United Society of Shakers v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1873-09-09· cited 31×
- Coble v. Beall.Supreme Court of North Carolina· 1902-06-13· cited 27×
- Delano v. CaseIllinois Supreme Court· 1887-06-17· cited 27×
- Smith v. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina· 1906-09-11· cited 22×
- Currie v. . HawkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1896-02-05· cited 13×
- McClure v. FellowsSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1902-12-16· cited 11×
- Parker v. . HardenSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1897-09-05· cited 9×
- Caldwell v. . BatesSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1896-02-05· cited 7×
- Solomon v. . BatesSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1896-02-05· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.