Houston v. Ormes
Citations
- 252 U.S. 469
- 40 S. Ct. 369
- 64 L. Ed. 667
- 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1525
Syllabus
<p>Where a fund has been appropriated by Congress for payment to a specified person in satisfaction of a finding of the Court of Claims, the duty of the Treasury officials to pay it over is ministerial; and a suit by one who has an equitable right in the fund, for attorney’s fees, to establish such right as against the owner, and to require the Treasury officials to pay the fund to a receiver, is not a suit against the United States, and may be maintained in the courts of the District of Columbia if the owner, as well as the officials, is made a party and bound by the decree so that it may afford due acquittance to the Government. P. 472.</p> <p>The situs of the debt in- such cases is not material, if its owner voluntarily appears and answers .without objecting to the jurisdiction. P. 474.</p> <p>.Section 3477 of the Revised Statutes does not prevent assignment by operation of law after a claim has been allowed. P.'473.</p>
Judges: Pitney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.