Houston v. Lowes of Savannah, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, in the event two precedents of the Supreme Court conflict, the more recent case is controlling, because the case decided by this Court \later in time is the more persuasive decision\
• holding that, in the event two precedents of the Supreme Court conflict, the more recent case is controlling, because the case decided by this Court “later in time is the more persuasive decision”
• holding that, in the event two precedents of the Supreme Court of Georgia are in conflict, the more recent case is controlling, because the case decided “later in time is the more persuasive decision”
• providing that “[i]t is a well-established principle that a statute must be viewed so as to make all its parts harmonize and to give a sensible and intelligent effect to each part. [Cit.]”
• “[A] statute must be viewed so as to make all its parts harmonize and to give a sensible and intelligent effect to each part.”
• “[A] statute must be viewed so as to make all its parts harmonize and to give a sensible and intelligent effect to each part.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).