Houston Lighting & Power Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the interest of the plaintiffs in gathering the information necessary to prove their case, particularly to prove the element of discriminatory intent, outweighs the [defendants’] interest” in preventing disclosure
• stressing strong public policy which favors “private enforcement of anti-discrimination laws”
• “The attorney-client privilege is triggered only by a client’s request for legal, as contrasted with business advice . . . .”
• “The attorney-client privilege is triggered only by a client’s request for legal,'as contrasted with business advice[.]”
• “The attorney-client privilege is triggered only by a client’s request for legal, as contrasted with business advice . . . .”
• “The attorney-client privilege is triggered only by a client’s request for legal, as contrasted with business advice . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).