Houston Fire and Casualty Insurance Co. v. Nichols

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court of appeals erred by holding that a binder issued by insurer was a valued contract because, among other reasons, the binder was subject to the terms and conditions of the Texas Standard Fire Policy, which did not appear in the record
• holding that the court of appeals erred by holding that a binder issued by insurer was a valued contract because, among other reasons, the binder was subject to the terms and conditions of the Texas Standard Fire Policy, which did not appear in the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).