Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. United Stockyards Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that from the form of instruments, from evidence of intent in contemporaneous records, and from resulting avoidance of payment of property taxes, that limiting words “for municipal purposes” and “for a public park” were precatory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).