D. Maryland· 1/23/1962
Houser v. Snap-On Tools Corporation
Citations
- 202 F. Supp. 181
- 132 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 368
- 5 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 459
- 1962 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5646
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “procuring absence and doing nothing to facilitate presence are quite different things”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Northrop
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Van Products Co. v. General Welding & Fabricating Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1965-10-13· cited 135×
- Thomas Carey v. Bahama Cruise LinesFirst Circuit· 1988-12-20· cited 129×
- Roger Burten D/B/A Rainy Day Games & Toys v. Milton Bradley CompanyFirst Circuit· 1985-05-30· cited 59×
- Thomas Kirschner v. Paul Broadhead, James B. Brumfield, and John Robinson, M.D.Seventh Circuit· 1982-03-01· cited 44×
- Central Plastics Company v. GoodsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1975-05-06· cited 39×
- Oberlin v. Marlin American Corp.Seventh Circuit· 1979-04-24· cited 37×
- United States v. International Business Machines Corp.S.D. New York· 1981-05-27· cited 36×
- Bartell v. BartellCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-05-25· cited 33×
- Trimble, Administrator v. Coleman Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1968-01-27· cited 30×
- Alsco-Harvard Fraud Litigation Consolidated CasesDistrict of Columbia· 1981-08-21· cited 30×
- State v. LongSupreme Court of Alabama· 1977-04-01· cited 24×
- Morgan v. WardN.D. New York· 1988-11-07· cited 16×
- Colonial Realty Corp. v. Brunswick Corp.S.D. New York· 1971-08-31· cited 14×
- Caron v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1994-12-22· cited 12×
- Piper v. MillerWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1970-04-21· cited 11×
- Hoppe v. G.D. Searle & Co.S.D. New York· 1991-11-19· cited 10×
- Crown Industries, Inc. v. Kawneer CompanyN.D. Illinois· 1971-06-29· cited 9×
- Kono v. AuerHawaii Supreme Court· 1969-09-11· cited 8×
- Future Plastics, Inc. v. Ware Shoals Plastics, Inc.D. South Carolina· 1972-03-31· cited 8×
- Bartell v. BartellCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-09-10· cited 7×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Arnstein v. PorterSecond Circuit· 1946-02-11· cited 555×
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. MaslandSupreme Court· 1917-05-21· cited 198×
- Hoeltke v. C. M. Kemp Mfg. Co.Fourth Circuit· 1936-01-10· cited 157×
- Smith v. Dravo Corp.Seventh Circuit· 1953-05-11· cited 138×
- Sandlin v. JohnsonEighth Circuit· 1944-03-27· cited 47×
- Shellmar Products Co. v. Allen-Qualley Co.Seventh Circuit· 1929-12-24· cited 43×
- Allen-Qualley Co. v. Shellmar Products Co.N.D. Illinois· 1929-03-22· cited 33×
- Moore v. Ford Motor Co.Second Circuit· 1930-07-14· cited 27×
- Mycalex Corporation v. Pemco CorporationD. Maryland· 1946-02-05· cited 25×
- Moore v. Ford Motor Co.S.D. New York· 1928-08-08· cited 20×
- Alfio Batelli v. Kagan and Gaines Co., Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1956-08-08· cited 16×
- Hisel v. Chrysler Corp.W.D. Missouri· 1951-01-18· cited 15×
- Weiss v. WeinerD. Maryland· 1950-05-29· cited 14×
- Thompson v. ThompsonD.C. Circuit· 1947-09-29· cited 10×
- Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. BurgerS.D. New York· 1939-04-04· cited 9×
- Joe Boop v. Ford Motor Company, Dearborn Motors CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1960-05-05· cited 7×
- Speciner v. Reynolds Metals CompanyS.D. New York· 1959-09-30· cited 7×
- The American Gage & Manufacturing Company and Alfred A. Anglemyer v. Felber Maasdam, D.B.A. Maasdam Pow'r PullSixth Circuit· 1957-06-06· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.