Houser v. Seals

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the Court scrutinizes and weighs, in light of Mosley, all the facts surrounding the second interrogation
• after the court denied the defendant’s motion to exclude testimony of his former wife, he argued that her “testimony was given because of a desire for revenge arising out of certain unrelated events;” the appellate court found no error in the trial court’s decision to allow the testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).