Skip to main content
· 10/19/1994

House v. Hager

Citations

  • 883 P.2d 261
  • 130 Or. App. 646
  • 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 1489

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reiterating the principle that an uncommunicated acquiescence is insufficient to rebut the presumption of hostility
  • new use of prescriptive easement by dominant estate upheld in the absence of evidence that proposed new use imposes a new burden on the servient estate
  • presumption of adverse use rebutted by any evidence of permission
  • “uncommunicated acquiescence” held insufficient to rebut the presumption

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warren, Edmonds, Landau

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.