House v. Close

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “an intermediate interest in land in favor of a third party [is] unaffected by the doctrine of merger”
• holding that a trial court’s error “in [offender] classification” will not “render the sentence illegal so long as the classification falls within the purview of the Sentencing Act”
• no Tenn. R. App. P. 11 application filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).