House v. Baxter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing and remanding with instructions to consider whether post-expiration conduct demonstrated an intent to impliedly extend terms of original -9- contract
• “There is no evidence of the parties’ conduct following [the expiration date] which implies a contract to require cause.”
• “Even without an implied extension of the written agreement, the prior written agreement is evidence of intent of the [parties] that termination was to be without cause.”
• “There is no evidence of the parties’ conduct following [the expiration date] which implies a contract to require cause.”
• “Even without an implied extension of the written agreement, the prior written agreement is evidence of intent of the [parties] that termination was to be without cause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).