House of Koscot Development Corporation v. American Line Cosmetics, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that moving for judgment notwithstanding the verdict does not cure the failure to move for a direct verdict before the case was submitted to a jury
• general directed verdict motion insufficient predicate to j. n. o. v. challenging sufficiency of damage evidence
• general directed verdict motion insufficient predicate to j. n. o. v. challenging sufficiency of damage evidence
• by implication: upholding denial of motion for directed verdict and sending case to jury on theory of alter ego to pierce corporate veil
• since defendant failed to assert as grounds for directed verdict the sufficiency of the evidence of damages the question was not preserved for appeal by asserting such grounds in a motion after the jury’s verdict

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).