Skip to main content
· 11/27/1990

Housand v. Bra-Con Industries, Inc.

Citations

  • 751 F. Supp. 541
  • 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16084
  • 1990 WL 185891

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the doctrine’s likely applicability in Maryland because of its roots in the Restatement (Second) of Torts, a common source of Maryland tort law
  • noting the doctrine's likely applicability in Maryland because of its roots in the Restatement (Second) of Torts, a common source of Maryland tort law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Motz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.