Houraney v. Burton & Associates, P.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff failed to explain why statement was fraudulent -where it was “not necessarily inconsistent” with plain. tiffs factual allegations
• holding that plaintiff failed to explain why statement was- fraudulent where it was “not necessarily inconsistent” with plaintiffs factual allegations
• proposed fraud claim fails to meet heightened specificity standard where plaintiff “does not state how . . . omission misled him”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).