Skip to main content

Houlihan v. State

Citations

  • 579 S.W.2d 213
  • 1979 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1306

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding no appellate jurisdiction over Houlihan’s direct appeal from an order overruling a motion to place him on shock probation because neither article 42.12 nor any other statute authorizes such an appeal
  • form in which matter is presented does not control form of writ by which matter is disposed
  • “Nor . . . does the form in which the matter is originally presented control the form of writ by which the matter is disposed.”
  • capias after mandate executed one day, defendant incarcerated in TDC the next
  • “It is axiomatic that the writ of mandamus may not be utilized to revise or correct an error in discretion committed in exercise of a judicial duty unless in the particular case there is a clear abuse of discretion.”
  • dismissing appeal of order denying motion for shock probation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clinton, Douglas, Dally, Davis, Phillips

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

71 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Houlihan v. State

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.