Houlahan v. Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an email sent to a resident in the District of Columbia does not constitute a persistent course of conduct in the District of Columbia
• conducting a de novo review of the R&R although the pro se plaintiff’s objections were conclusory and repeated his original arguments
• “If, however, the party makes only conclusory or general objections, or simply reiterates his original arguments, the Court reviews the [R. & R.] only for clear error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).