Skip to main content
· 10/7/2009

Houghton v. Morey (In Re Morey)

Citations

  • 416 B.R. 364
  • 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 3965
  • 2009 WL 3247155

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the dual representation of defendants in an adversary proceeding and the debtor in the main bankruptcy created a conflict that could not be overcome by consent
  • “the only duty which counsel for the [chapter 7] debtor assumes is to his or her client”
  • “the only duty which counsel for the [chapter 7] debtor assumes is to his or her client”
  • “the only duty which counsel for the [chapter 7] debtor assumes is to his or her client”
  • “the only duty which counsel for the [chapter 7] debtor assumes is to his or her client”
  • “the only duty which counsel for the [chapter 7] debtor assumes is to his or her client”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henry J. Boroff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.