· 10/7/2009
Houghton v. Morey (In Re Morey)
Citations
- 416 B.R. 364
- 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 3965
- 2009 WL 3247155
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the dual representation of defendants in an adversary proceeding and the debtor in the main bankruptcy created a conflict that could not be overcome by consent
- “the only duty which counsel for the [chapter 7] debtor assumes is to his or her client”
- “the only duty which counsel for the [chapter 7] debtor assumes is to his or her client”
- “the only duty which counsel for the [chapter 7] debtor assumes is to his or her client”
- “the only duty which counsel for the [chapter 7] debtor assumes is to his or her client”
- “the only duty which counsel for the [chapter 7] debtor assumes is to his or her client”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Henry J. Boroff
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.