· 5/5/1969
Houghtaling v. Virginia
Citations
- 394 U.S. 1021
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the district 11 court did not abuse its discretion by denying the defendant’s motion to stay where the 12 || district court had considered its “interest in clearing its docket”
- noting burden on depositors of savings and loan if civil proceedings against director of savings and loan are stayed pending possible criminal proceedings
- setting forth similar factors considered in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- affirming denial of stay when civil action had been pending for a year
- upholding the district court’s stay, 18 in part, because “the action had been pending for a year, and the court had an interest in 19 clearing its docket”
- “A court may decide to stay the civil case when 13 required by the interests of justice.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.