Skip to main content
· 11/8/2002

Hough v. Stockbridge

Citations

  • 54 P.3d 192

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that challenge to expired antiharassment protection order was not moot where petitioners sought to “cleanse their record of the continuing stigma of the antiharassment order” and presented issues of public importance
  • declining to reverse a trial court’s decision not to award a petitioner attorney fees under RCW 10.14.090(2)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.