Hough v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• looking to possible award, measured by the statement of claim before the arbitrator, that might result from rehearing as motion is to vacate and remand for rehearing
• modification sought under guise of alleged miscalculation “would affect the substantive rights of the parties and reflects an attempt to revisit the merits of the arbitrators’ award’’
• courts may not use Rule 60(b) to overturn an arbitration award
• courts may not use Rule 60(b) to overturn an arbitration award
• “In this action to 10 The amount-in-controversy requirement would be met here under the demand approach. Conmed’s demand for arbitration requested, in addition to a declaratory judgment, damages in the amount of $187,492.96. (Dkt. No. 1-3, at 35–36

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).