Skip to main content
· 12/5/1912

Hough & Spradlin Co. v. Clark

Citations

  • 151 Ky. 61
  • 151 S.W. 28
  • 1912 Ky. LEXIS 745

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A] bank fraud conviction requires proof of a scheme—-whether or not it is actually capable of success—that would, if realized,' victimize a bank ... or put it at risk of loss.” (emphasis omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lassing

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.