Hotetz v. Hotetz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that claims for deliberate fabrication of evidence require a less demanding causation standard, requiring that 19 the plaintiff show that there is a reasonable likelihood that the alleged fabrication “could have affected the judgment of the jury”
• “The 66 CTR. FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY V. BUREAU OF LAND MGMT. traditional means of proving factual causation is the ‘but for’ causation test.”
• the crux of a deliberate 18 fabrication of evidence claim is the denial of the right to fair trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).