· 3/23/2000
Hotel Tabard Inn v. District of Columbia Department of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs
Citations
- 747 A.2d 1168
- 2000 D.C. App. LEXIS 77
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- agency interpretation must not be unreasonable or inconsistent with legislative purpose
- agency interpretation must not be unreasonable or inconsistent with legislative purpose
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reid
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.