Hotel Constructors, Inc. v. Seagrave Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff stated fraud claim where facts supported an inference that defendant never intended to carry out its promise
• “purely conclu-sory allegation that defendant never intended to perform, standing alone, could not convert a claim for breach of contract into one for fraudulent inducement to contract”
• plaintiff stated fraud claim against defendants who promised to perform construction work for the plaintiff but already had made so many prior contractual commitments to do similar work on other projects that they could not possibly have intended to perform as promised

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).