Hot Stuff Foods, LLC v. Houston Casualty Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court did not abuse discretion in admitting company's president and former CFO's lay testimony on damages due to his \intimate knowledge of [company] operations\
• allowing opinion testimony from president and CFO of company about lost profits
• “We deplore this kind of [] sandbagging and would have been inclined to strike the Reply Brief had we been asked to do so.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).