Hot Rods, LLC v. Northrop Grumman Systems Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Moreover, extrinsic evidence may be offered ‘to resolve an ambiguity,’ even 20 when the contract is an integrated agreement.”
• “[W]hile Northrop argues there must be ‘express language’ in an indemnity clause before it is interpreted to encompass first party claims, we disagree. It is the intent of the provision, and the agreement as a whole, that governs.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).