Hot Locks, Inc. v. Ooh La La, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Travelling from Indiana to Illinois to set fire, setting fire and using mails to defraud insurer constitutes 3 separate acts of racketeering sufficient to establish a “pattern” of racketeering activity.
• arsonist hired by company official to \torch\ its headquarters \associates with\ and \participates\ in the company's affairs under Sec. 1962(c)
• arsonist hired by company official to \torch\ its headquarters \associates with\ and \participates\ in the company's affairs under Sec. 1962(c)
• arsonist hired by company official to “torch” its headquarters “associates with” and “participates” in the company’s affairs under § 1962(c)
• acts in violation of state arson statute and federal mail fraud statute supported federal RICO conviction, although there was no indication of conviction under either underlying statute
• arsonist hired by company official to “torch” its headquarters \associates with” and \participates” in the company’s affairs under § 1962(c)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).