Host Marriott Corp. v. Fast Food Operators, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying motion to disqualify for movant’s failure to put forth evidence evincing likelihood that counsel is likely to be a necessary trial witness
• in absence of preclusion under RPC 1.7 or RPC 1.9, any disqualification would be limited to attorney not firm; disqualification motion \denied without prejudice to being renewed\ if it subsequently develops that the attorney \will be a witness at trial\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).