Hossack v. Floor Covering Associates of Joliet, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court properly granted employer judgment as a matter of law on plaintiff’s sex discrimination claim because there was no direct evidence that the employer’s reasons for firing her “were pretexts unworthy of belief”
• “An unlawful employment practice is established when a plaintiff demonstrates that a protected characteristic, such as sex, was a motivating factor for an employment decision.”
• “the court can neither reweigh the evidence nor make its own credibility determinations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).