Hospital Menonita de Guayama, Inc. v. NLRB

Oral arguments

• Argued

  36 min recording
  Listen
• Argued

  41 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence of a settlement was inadmissible where the admission \implicitly requires the jury to infer some indicia of causation\
• holding that appellants provided no persuasive basis to conclude that further discovery would have been essential to their opposition
• holding that plaintiffs were not entitled to additional discovery where they “proffered no persuasive basis for the district court to conclude that further discovery would yield” relevant evidence
• finding that the negotiation evidence offered for another purpose was too closely related to the ultimate validity of the negotiation
• observing that the trial court “may properly deny further discovery” when a party had “a fully adequate opportunity for discovery”
• upholding exclusion of settlement evidence under Rule 408 where purported “other purpose” was “closely intertwined” with liability on underlying claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).