Skip to main content
· 12/6/1990

Hospital Corp. of America v. Lindberg

Citations

  • 571 So. 2d 446
  • 1990 WL 198320

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a complaint that failed to allege compliance with statutory prerequisites was subject to dismissal
  • holding that filing a presuit notice at the same time as the complaint is not fatal if the notice is filed within the limitations period
  • holding that “in medical malpractice actions, if a presuit notice is served at the same time as a complaint is filed, the complaint is subject to dismissal with leave to amend”
  • explaining that where presuit notice filed same time as complaint, complaint subject to dismissal; plaintiff may subsequently file amended complaint asserting compliance with presuit notice and investigation requirements
  • “While such a condition precedent to suit is necessary in order to maintain a cause of action, the failure to do so does not divest the trial court of subject matter jurisdiction.”
  • “We therefore hold that, in medical malpractice actions, if a presuit notice is served at the same time as a complaint is filed [(i.e., condition precedent not met)], the complaint is subject to dismissal with leave to amend.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Overton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.