Hospicomm, Inc. v. Fleet Bank, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “Article 4 does not contemplate electronic withdrawals”
• stating that electronic fund transfers were not contemplated by drafters under Articles 3 and 4 because these articles govern check collection and “depend upon bankers looking at particular words and numerals on the face of a particular instrument.”
• dismissing claims under gist doctrine because the duties plaintiff accused defendant of violating sounded in contract rather than in tort

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).