Hoskinson v. High Gear Repair, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[H]ow can somebody . . . search 2019 tapes in only four days that is not logic[al] for [a] reasonable man to belie[ve].”
• “It is well-established that ‘control’, which is defined not as possession, but as the legal right to obtain documents on demand, is the test as to whether production is required.”
• quoting: Alexander v. FBI, 193 F.R.D. 1, 2-3 (D.D.C.2000)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).