Horvath v. Bank of New York, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that entity other than lender had authority to foreclose under Virginia law despite transfer of loan, based on entity’s status as note holder
• observing that appellant’s \arguments on this score stem more from his views of what the law ought to be than from what it actually is” and declining \to accept his invitation to rewrite Virginia law”
• reciting language from the note that “the Lender may transfer this note” and that “[t]he Lender or anyone who takes this Note by transfer and who is entitled to receive payments under this Note is called the ‘Note Holder’ ”
• “[N]otes and contemporaneous written agreements executed as part of the same transaction will be construed together as forming one contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).