Horton v. State
Citations
- 85 Ohio St. (N.S.) 13
Syllabus
<p>Obtaining property by false pretenses — Section 7076, Revised Statutes — Indictment must be certain and precise — No defense to indictment that money obtained was unlawful.</p> <p>1. An indictment under Section 7076, Revised Statutes, for obtaining money by false pretenses must set forth the alleged false pretenses with such certainty and precision as will reasonably apprise the defendant of what he will be required to answer, and so that the court may determine what evidence is admissible and must allege that the pretenses were in fact false and made with intent to defraud.</p> <p>2. It is no defense to an indictment for obtaining money by false pretenses that the transaction in which the money was so obtained was unlawful.</p>
Judges: Davis, Donahue, Johnson, Price, Proposition, Shauck, Spear, Syllabus
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dillingham v. StateOhio Supreme Court· 1855-12-15· cited 56×
- People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court· 1894-05-31· cited 42×
- Commonwealth v. O'BrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1898-11-28· cited 16×
- People v. WatsonMichigan Supreme Court· 1889-06-28· cited 13×
- People v. BeheeMichigan Supreme Court· 1892-02-19· cited 11×
- Foster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1910-07-25· cited 7×
- State v. PettySupreme Court of Missouri· 1894-01-31· cited 6×
- People v. KlockNew York County Courts· 1907-06-15· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.