Horton v. Ronalds

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “to the extent that Franklin alleges the appointment of the conservator was made in bad faith, those claims were ones sounding in tort over which this court has no jurisdiction”
• finding that the banking statutes in question were intended to strengthen enforcement powers and civil sanctions, and to curtail investments that pose unacceptable risks; the purpose of the statutes did not involve the government acting as anything other than a regulating body
• “[T]o the extent that Franklin alleges the appointment of the conservator was made in bad faith, those claims were ones sounding in tort over which this court has no jurisdiction....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).