Skip to main content
· 6/13/1990

Horton v. Reely

Citations

  • 738 F. Supp. 1336
  • 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7311
  • 1990 WL 82685

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that employer did not engage in “outrageous” conduct by allegedly asking employee to use unlawful timekeeping practices
  • finding argument regarding “noncompliance with the [Government] Claims 23 Act” was “inapplicable” to federal constitutional claims in § 1983 action
  • finding argument regarding “noncompliance with the [Government] Claims 23 Act” was “inapplicable” to federal constitutional claims in § 1983 action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frye

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.