Horton v. Nationwide Mutual Ins.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] ‘unified’ appeal ‘is particularly desirable where . . . the adjudicated and pending claims are closely related and stem from essentially the same factual allegations.’” (quoting Cullen v. Margiotta, 618 F.2d 226, 228 (2d Cir. 1980)) (alteration in original)
• “A statement by a district court only of its conclusion, in the language of [Rule 54(b)], that ‘there is no just reason for delay,’ unaccompanied by any explanation of the assessments that led to that conclusion, would be insufficiently explained.” (collecting cases)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).