Horton v. Mitchell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court of appeals presumes trial court found all facts necessary to support ruling and must affirm if reasonable construction of the evidence justifies decision
• alteration 4 HAISLIP, et al. v. AL-SHAWABKEH, et al. Decision of the Court in original
• “When there is no request for findings and the trial court does not make specific findings of fact, we must assume that the trial court found every fact necessary to support its [ruling] and must affirm if any reasonable construction of the evidence justifies the decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).