Horton v. Ercole

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that trial counsel was not 3 ineffective for failing to request a missing witness instruction where \any testimony\ provided by the alleged missing witnesses would have been \cumulative\
• “Horton has not set forth any evidence that [the uncalled witnesses] would have provided favorable testimony for the prosecution. In fact, his argument is exactly the opposite — that they would provide testimony that would support Horton’s misidentification defense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).