Horton v. Darby Elec. Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, as a matter of law, that a handbook containing conspicuous disclaimers and a non-mandatory discipline procedure did not alter at-will status
• holding, as a matter of law, that a handbook containing conspicuous disclaimers and a non-mandatory discipline procedure did not alter at-will status
• affirming summary judgment for employer when handbook provided discipline procedures that contained permissive language
• progressive discipline policy did not constitute a contract where there were conspicuous disclaimers and policy language was discretionary rather than mandatory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).