Horton v. City of Seattle
Citations
- 61 Wash. 301
- 112 P. 366
- 1910 Wash. LEXIS 1335
Syllabus
<p>Municipal Corporations — Personal Injuries — Notice oe Claim— Variance. Under a claim against a city for personal injuries alleging that plaintiff was greatly, bruised and injured and her whole right side paralyzed, and that she suffered great pain under her kidney, it is permissible to show injuries to the right shoulder and back.</p> <p>Appeal — Review—Harmless Error — Evidence. It is not prejudicial error to permit little more than a mere incidental reference to earning capacity under a complaint failing to allege loss in that respect.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a trial court’s grant of an order for a mental competency evaluation is “conclusive of its having found reasonable ground to believe [the defendant] was entitled to a mental examination and a competency hearing”
- stating that a trial court’s grant of an order for a mental competency evaluation is “conclusive of its having found reasonable ground to believe [the defendant] was entitled to a mental examination and a competency hearing”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.